Republicans, look what I just found! The Dumocrats are openly stating that they plan to TERMINATE THE FILIBUSTER if they ever take power, and EXPAND THE SUPREME COURT. In other words, they will add two Radical Left States, 4 Dumocrat Senators, many Congressmen/women, their dream of 21 Supreme Court Justices (Not just 13, an unlucky number!), an impossible to beat number of Electoral College Votes (and that's the Ballgame!), "Popular" Vote Landslides, and so much else. The Republican Party will never win another Election. How much longer are you going to allow this to happen to you? They will TERMINATE THE FILIBUSTER in their first hour, and I'll be sitting home with tears in my eyes saying, "I TOLD YOU SO!"
Key House caucus leaders target Supreme Court, Senate filibuster: politico.com
9:04 PM · July 3, 2026 · archived post
Prominent Democrats really are floating this. The "21 justices," the "first hour," and "never win again" are his.
The short version
He is not inventing the idea. House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries has said "everything is on the table" for the Supreme Court, and Rep. Jamie Raskin has proposed adding seats to it. That part is real, and the post even links a news story about it. The inflation is everything after that. The number Raskin actually proposed is 13, to match the 13 federal circuits, which the post itself concedes ("Not just 13") before swapping in a "21" no one has proposed. Expanding the Court or ending the filibuster would each have to pass both chambers of Congress and survive Trump's own veto, so "in their first hour" is not possible while he holds the pen. And "the Republican Party will never win another Election" is his prediction, not something any Democrat "is openly stating."
Start with what is true, because it is the strongest part of the post. After the Supreme Court weakened the Voting Rights Act in the spring of 2026, House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries told supporters the party would "have to explore massive judicial reform," and that on the Court, "everything is on the table." Rep. Jamie Raskin, one of the most senior Democrats on the Judiciary Committee, has argued for enlarging the Court. Eliminating the legislative filibuster has been openly discussed on the left for years. So "the Democrats are openly stating" that they would consider these things is fair, and it is why the post can link a real news story rather than make one up.
The problem is the numbers he attaches. Raskin's actual proposal is a 13-seat Court, one justice for each of the 13 federal circuits, which would add four seats to the current nine. The post names that real number and then talks past it: "their dream of 21 Supreme Court Justices (Not just 13, an unlucky number!)." No Democrat in Congress has proposed 21. The "13" is the plan on the table; the "21" is his.
And "in their first hour" describes something that cannot happen while he is president. Changing the size of the Court, ending the filibuster, or admitting new states each requires a bill that passes both the House and the Senate and is then signed into law, or passed over a veto by two-thirds of both chambers. Trump holds the veto pen until January 2029. A future Congress could try any of this; none of it clears "in their first hour," and the filibuster change itself remains contested among Senate Democrats. "The Republican Party will never win another Election" is not a plan anyone announced. It is his forecast of what would follow if every one of these long-shot steps succeeded at once.
What is actually on the table. #
Set his version beside what Democrats have actually said and proposed.
What is true here. #
The alarm is not manufactured. Prominent Democrats really have said, out loud, that they would consider expanding the Supreme Court and changing the filibuster if they win power, after a run of rulings they call illegitimate. A reader who is uneasy that one party is openly debating enlarging the Court is reacting to something real, and worth debating on its own terms.
What the post does is take that real debate and harden it into a settled, unstoppable plan, with a justice count no one proposed and a timeline the Constitution does not allow. The honest version is "some Democrats want to expand the Court and end the filibuster, and I am against it." Not "they will install 21 justices and two states in their first hour, and Republicans will never win again."
Read next
This is one post in a running series that sets a recent Truth Social claim beside the record. The post text is reproduced verbatim from the archived original (posted 9:04 PM Eastern, July 3, 2026); the rendering above is ours, not a screenshot. Sourcing is the Democrats' own quoted statements and proposals as reported, and the constitutional requirements for changing the Court, the filibuster, or the number of states, as of July 2026. Where a claim is a prediction rather than a stated plan, the page says so. Corrections welcome.